Showing posts with label Arne Duncan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Arne Duncan. Show all posts

Saturday, July 5, 2014

NEA Convention 2014: Union Calls For Duncan’s Resignation

NEAConvention2014:UnionCallsForDuncan’sResignation

NEA Convention 2014: Union Calls For Duncan’s Resignation

posted at 8:31 am on July 5, 2014 by Mike Antonucci

The National Education Association Representative Assembly in a close vote officially called for the resignation of U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan. This is an accomplishment of sorts, in that the delegates have been trying to get him to resign since 2009, but this is the first time the vote has been successful.

This particular item was introduced in a rather odd speech from California Teachers Association president Dean Vogel, who went on about leaders needing to take responsibility for what happens under their charge. Vogel asked rhetorically “Where does the buck stop?” and concluded “The guy at the top has got to go.” Apparently the buck stopped far from the guy at the top if Arne Duncan is the cause of all this angst.

No need to repeat myself on this issue. Check out my post from May 2013 on how NEA could have easily avoided Arne Duncan’s appointment in the first place.


Related Posts:

Source from: hotair

Sunday, June 15, 2014

Blue on blue violence in wake of CA teachers union ruling

BlueonblueviolenceinwakeofCA

Blue on blue violence in wake of CA teachers union ruling

posted at 9:31 am on June 15, 2014 by Jazz Shaw

Ed covered the initial court ruling last week and some of its potential implications, but the California judge’s decision regarding several teachers union rules involving the constitutionality of tenure has raised a few hackles. The unions are none too happy with some members of their own tribe, including Education Secretary Arne Duncan, and they want you all to know.

In an open letter to Duncan published Thursday night, American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten took the secretary to task for his perceived betrayal.

“This week,” the letter begins, “we needed your leadership; to demonstrate that teacher and student interests are aligned; that we must press—60 years after Brown v. Board—for educational equity; that it takes more than a focus on teachers to improve public education.

“But instead, you added to the polarization. And teachers across the country are wondering why the secretary of education thinks that stripping them of their due process is the way to help all children succeed.”

It’s not immediately obvious that the administration is suddenly seeing the light regarding the insane rules which teachers unions impose to hang on to their power. It is far more likely a case that they’ve simply been following the poll numbers (as usual) and seeing the writing on the wall.

Teachers unions still have too much money and too many members to be counted out. Collectively, they represent 3.8 million workers and retirees. They bring in more than $2 billion a year.

Yet the share of Americans who see teachers unions as a negative influence on public schools shot up to 43 percent last year, up from 31 percent in 2009, according to national polling conducted by Harvard’s Program on Education Policy and Governance and the journal Education Next. By contrast, 32 percent see unions as a positive force, up from 28 percent in 2009, the poll found.

Weingarten has long been the nation’s official Baghdad Bob of education reform, though incredibly more effective than her Iraqi counterpart. She gets trotted out on every news network, print outlet or web space willing to give her the time of day and the message never varies. Teachers are never the problem and all of you Right Wingnuts are just jealous of the power of the unions and all of these problems could be readily resolved if the taxpayers would just give us a boatload more money.

She’s done more interviews than I can count and I’ve yet to see Weingarten give a coherent answer to the still extant problems of the rubber rooms, teachers remaining on the payroll after being charged with sexual abuse of minors and a raft of other issues. And all the while, the answers repeat the mantra of how we’ll be harming the children if we “go after” the teachers. It would be nice to think that the tide is starting to turn on this issue – beginning with the recent events in California – but they’ve been hanging on to that power for a long time and they certainly won’t go gentle into that good night.


Related Posts:

Source from: hotair

Wednesday, June 11, 2014

Arne Duncan: No, we don’t actually know the cost of our student loan program

ArneDuncan:No,wedon’tactuallyknowthe

Arne Duncan: No, we don’t actually know the cost of our student loan program

posted at 5:01 pm on June 11, 2014 by Erika Johnsen

An unsurprising yet groan-inducing addendum to the empty gesture executive order President Obama so magnanimously introduced this week to allow millions of student-loan borrowers to cap their monthly payments at 10 percent of their current income and then be fully forgiven after 20 years — a “favor” to borrowers to lessen their burdens that will, in the long run, only serve to inflate future tuition prices and borrowing costs ever further. I missed this on Monday, but the WFB didn’t:

SECRETARY OF EDUCATION ARNE DUNCAN: We actually don’t know the cost yet. Obviously we have to go through this regulatory process, so we’ll figure that out the back end. But we think this is something that will be fantastic for the economy. … We’ll work through the details as we go through the regulatory process.

Translation: Don’t know, don’t really care.

Anyhow, speaking of government-issued ostensible favors to student borrowers that actually end up worsening their problems, Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s even larger and similarly perverse-incentivizing student-loan proposal was shot down in the Senate this morning, at least for now:

The Senate on Wednesday voted not to move forward on a bill from Sen. Elizabeth Warren that would have allowed an estimated 25 million people with older student loans to refinance that debt at current, lower interest rates.

Democrats are vowing to keep the issue alive and bring it back for another airing this year. …

“We’re not giving up,” Warren said at a press conference shortly after the vote, slamming Republicans for blocking the bill. …

Warren’s bill would pay for refinancing students’ loans by raising taxes on the wealthy, a guaranteed non-starter for Republicans in the Senate and the House. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) — who Tuesday said Democrats will bring it back to the floor in the future if it fails to pass Congress — has in the past said that paying for a student loan bill using the so-called “Buffet rule” is a surefire way to politicize it.


Related Posts:

Source from: hotair

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

Duncan: Sorry if anyone was offended by my playing the race card on Common Core opposition

Duncan:Sorryifanyonewasoffendedbymy

Duncan: Sorry if anyone was offended by my playing the race card on Common Core opposition

posted at 12:41 pm on November 19, 2013 by Ed Morrissey

Honestly, I had to read this a couple of times before I could believe it.  Did Education Secretary Arne Duncan really say that opposition to his Common Core program was mainly from “white suburban moms” unhappy with test score declines from their children? Could anyone be that clumsy and still keep his Cabinet position? That’s a rhetorical question, of course, considering that Kathleen Sebelius is still on the job, but still.

Anyway, yes he did, on Friday:

“It’s fascinating to me that some of the pushback is coming from, sort of, white suburban moms who — all of a sudden — their child isn’t as brilliant as they thought they were and their school isn’t quite as good as they thought they were, and that’s pretty scary,” Duncan said, according to media reports. “You’ve bet your house and where you live and everything on ‘My child’s going to be prepared.’ That can be a punch in the gut.”

And now he’s sorry. Sort of:

Education Secretary Arne Duncan tried Monday to quell the outrage sparked by his comments that injected race and class into the debate about the Common Core academic standards taking root in classrooms across the country.

Duncan said Friday that he was fascinated by the fact that some opposition to the standards was coming from “white suburban moms” who fear that “their child isn’t as brilliant as they thought they were.”

The remark lit up social-media sites, prompting pointed responses from bloggers, an open letter from a school superintendent, digital images of Duncan’s official federal portrait with the word “bigot” emblazoned across it, and one congressman’s call for Duncan’s firing.

What specifically did Duncan regret about his statement? “Clumsy phrasing.” No, seriously:

“I used some clumsy phrasing that I regret — particularly because it distracted from an important conversation about how to better prepare all of America’s students for success,” he wrote. “I want to encourage a difficult conversation and challenge the underlying assumption that when we talk about the need to improve our nation’s schools, we are talking only about poor minority students in inner cities. This is simply not true. Research demonstrates that as a country, every demographic group has room for improvement.”

I’m still somewhat agnostic on the specifics of Common Core, but I’ve certainly followed the opposition to it as spearheaded by my dear friend and Boss Emeritus Michelle Malkin, who isn’t a “white suburban mom.” I’m naturally skeptical of one-size-fits-all solutions from Washington, though, especially on education, and the plan looks like a typical Ten Year Plan that ignores the damage done in the short term. Casting opposition to this in racial terms is not just offensive, it’s practically an admission that the Obama administration can’t answer the legitimate criticisms against the program.

Dana Loesch debated the issue with former Frank Lautenberg adviser Julie Roginsky on The Kelly File last night. Dana, another friend of mine opposed to Common Core, passionately and patiently makes the argument that Common Core is yet another assault on local control over education, while Roginsky has no answer for the “clumsy phrasing” from Duncan:


Related Posts:

Source from: hotair