Showing posts with label Federal Bureau of Investigation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Federal Bureau of Investigation. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 15, 2014

Suspect in Benghazi attack killed under mysterious circumstances

SuspectinBenghaziattackkilledundermysteriouscircumstances

Suspect in Benghazi attack killed under mysterious circumstances

posted at 10:01 am on July 15, 2014 by Ed Morrissey

Faraj al-Shibli did not lack for enemies, it would appear. The Libyan government held him for a time after the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi, at least long enough for the FBI to interrogate him. Two days ago, another militia grabbed him in the former Cyrenaica capital of Marj, a town just off the Mediterranean, 96 kilometers from Benghazi. Yesterday, locals found his body:

Faraj al-Shibli, who was suspected of involvement in the 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, has been found dead, a Libyan source and locals in the town of Marj said.

Al-Shibli, whose name is also spelled Chalabi, was last seen being detained by a local militia in Marj two days ago, a Libyan source said.

It is unclear what happened to al-Shibli since then, but his body was found Monday in the eastern Libyan town of Marj.

Locals in Marj also confirmed that al-Shibli’s body was found Monday.

Shibli didn’t lack for friends, either. CNN reports that investigators have discovered links between Shibli and al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), which operates out of Yemen. That’s a different organization than al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, which has operated in North Africa for years, and which became one of the biggest winners from the US-NATO war against Moammar Qaddafi. The removal of Qaddafi left a huge vacuum for the Islamist terror networks, which took advantage of the failed Libyan state to recruit, mobilize, and attack. The link to AQAP undercuts the narrative that the Benghazi attack was just a target of convenience for local networks, if Shibli was part of it.

But there’s more, according to the initial CNN report. Shibli also had friends in Pakistan and the al-Qaeda network there. That’s the so-called “core” al-Qaeda, the group behind the 9/11 attacks as well as attacks on the USS Cole, the Khobar Towers bombing, and the bombings of our embassies in Tanzania and Kenya. If those contacts have been established and if they existed prior to Benghazi, then that puts an even more interesting twist on the fact that the Benghazi consulate got sacked on the anniversary of the original 9/11 attacks.

All of this raises an even more intriguing question: why didn’t the US get Shibli from the Libyans? The Libyans had him securely enough that the FBI had the opportunity to interrogate him. In fact, the Libyans arrested him on his return from Pakistan, which should have raised lots of eyebrows. Did the Libyans refuse to extradite him? Did we ask? Or did we somehow find another way to “bring justice” to a Benghazi mastermind?


Related Posts:

Source from: hotair

Tuesday, July 8, 2014

Menendez: CIA says Cuba set up prostitution allegations

Menendez:CIAsaysCubasetupprostitutionallegations

Menendez: CIA says Cuba set up prostitution allegations

posted at 8:41 am on July 8, 2014 by Ed Morrissey

That would answer quite a few questions about the allegations surrounding Senator Robert Menendez’ trips to the Dominican Republic, courtesy of his good friend Salomon Melgen, but it doesn’t answer all of them. Two years ago, a shadowy figure named “Pete Williams” alleged that Melgen had arranged underaged prostitutes for Menendez on these trips, and the Daily Caller interviewed two women who claimed to have taken part in these sexcapades with the chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. That part of the story didn’t add up, and Menendez says the CIA has discovered why:

In a letter sent to Justice Department officials, the senator’s attorney asserts that the plot was timed to derail the ­political rise of Menendez (D-N.J.), one of Washington’s most ardent critics of the Castro regime. At the time, Menendez was running for reelection and was preparing to assume the powerful chairmanship of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

According to a former U.S. official with firsthand knowledge of government intelligence, the CIA had obtained credible evidence, including Internet protocol addresses, linking Cuban agents to the prostitution claims and to efforts to plant the story in U.S. and Latin American media.

The alleged Cuba connection was laid out in an intelligence report provided last year to U.S. government officials and sent by secure cable to the FBI’s counterintelligence division, according to the former official and a second person with close ties to Menendez who had been briefed on the matter.

The intelligence information indicated that operatives from Cuba’s Directorate of Intelligence helped create a fake tipster using the name “Pete Williams,” according to the former official. The tipster told FBI agents and others he had information about Menendez participating in poolside sex parties with underage prostitutes while vacationing at the Dominican Republic home of Salomon Melgen, a wealthy eye doctor, donor and friend of the senator.

Even at the time, the story seemed fishy, as I pointed out in November 2012. The timing with the election was just too clever by half, and the idea that these women had just discovered who “Bob” was seemed rather difficult to believe. By January, we discovered that “Pete Williams” had been dodging the FBI, and then started dodging Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), which had forwarded the allegations to the FBI in the first place. News stories floated to the surface about Menendez and prostitution for another month … and then suddenly ended in February 2013.

If “Pete Williams” turns out to have been a Cuban agent, that answers some of the mysteries involved in the Menendez-Melgen case. However, it doesn’t answer all of them. Nor does it end a larger probe into Menendez for more mundane forms of corruption, as the Post notes:

The FBI’s investigation into the prostitution claims was part of the broader and more substantive Justice Department inquiry into the Menendez-Melgen relationship.

Menendez twice intervened with top federal health-care officials to dispute their agency’s finding that Melgen had overbilled Medicare by $8.9 million for eye treatments at his clinics. The senator also urged top officials at the State and Commerce departments to use their influence over the Dominican Republic to enforce a port security contract for a company in which Melgen was part owner.

The status of the larger probe is uncertain. But according to two people familiar with the investigation, the Justice Department’s public-integrity section and FBI agents are actively pursuing the inquiry and eyeing possible charges against Menendez.

A federal grand jury took up the case more than a year ago, and the media has taken a little more interest in the influence peddling than other kinds of peddling. Melgen made headlines again this spring when he turned out to be the highest-paid Medicare doctor in the country, which might draw scrutiny all over again to the Florida ophthalmologist.

It looks like Menendez may be off the hook on prostitution allegations, but not off the hook for prostituting his office. Does Menendez want to be proclaiming this possible vindication-in-part very loudly and attract attention once again to the rest of the questions about his integrity?


Related Posts:

Source from: hotair

Thursday, July 3, 2014

Video: The case of the runaway jihadi bride

Video:Thecaseoftherunawayjihadibride

Video: The case of the runaway jihadi bride

posted at 10:01 am on July 3, 2014 by Ed Morrissey

The FBI routinely gets accused of entrapment when arresting potential home-grown jihadis, but the curious case of Shannon Maureen Conley demonstrates just how far the agency will go to avoid an arrest. Agents arrested Conley in April, according to an indictment unsealed last night, when she attempted to board a plane to Turkey to marry an ISIS fighter and support the jihad cause. The FBI had previously tried to get her to change her mind, involving her parents and even a local mosque to convince her to find moderate means to support Muslims abroad. Conley didn’t take the hint:

A Colorado woman was arrested at the Denver airport in April and charged with conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists, according to court documents that were unsealed Wednesday.

Shannon Maureen Conley, 19, allegedly told FBI agents before her arrest that she was going to be with a member of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, or ISIS, that she had met through the Internet.

“It’s a difficult time for us,” her mother, Ana Conley, told CNN on Wednesday.

Conley’s attorney, Robert William Pepin, said he had no comment.

His client was arrested on a jetway while trying to board a flight to Germany on April 8, according to a criminal complaint. She told investigators she was going to Turkey to await word from her suitor.

Conley, a certified nurse aide, had told FBI agents she was going to be the man’s wife and a nurse in a ISIS camp near the Turkish border, documents showed.

But that wasn’t the first time agents had talked to Conley. The FBI tried for five months to divert Conley’s actions into more lawful and less dangerous directions:

FBI agents became aware of Conley’s growing interest in extremism in November after she started talking about terrorism with employees of a suburban Denver church who found her wandering around and taking notes on the layout of the campus, according to the court documents. The church, Faith Bible Chapel in Arvada, was the scene of a 2007 shooting in which a man killed two missionary workers.

She spoke with agents several times after that, telling them of her desire for jihad, the records state. The agents tried openly to dissuade her, urging her instead to support Muslims through humanitarian efforts, which she told them was not an option.

“Conley felt that Jihad is the only answer to correct the wrongs against the Muslim world,” the documents say.

Agents encouraged Conley’s parents to get her to meet with elders at her mosque to find more moderate options. Her parents knew she had converted to Islam but were apparently unaware of her extremism, authorities said.

And even after that, FBI agents kept trying — almost literally until the moment she walked onto the jetway:

Her father told an agent in March that Conley and her suitor had asked for his blessing to marry and were surprised when he declined. Her father later found a one-way plane ticket to Turkey.

Four days before her arrest, she told agents “there was nothing they could do to change her mind and that she was still going.” They stopped her as she was walking down the jetway.

Bummer of a case, Mr. Pepin. Best of luck with your upcoming insanity plea for Ms. Conley.


Related Posts:

Source from: hotair

Thursday, June 12, 2014

FBI opening up criminal probe of VA

FBIopeningupcriminalprobeofVA

FBI opening up criminal probe of VA

posted at 2:31 pm on June 12, 2014 by Ed Morrissey

The pressure brought by Congress to get to the bottom of the massive wait-list fraud at the Department of Veterans Affairs has prompted the FBI to open a criminal probe, at least of the offices in Phoenix which were the epicenter of the scandal. FBI Director James Comey revealed that the agency has begun working with the VA’s Inspector General on its probe, sharing data and collecting evidence to determine whether prosecution will take place. Whether that FBI probe extends beyond Phoenix depends on what the IG finds elsewhere, Comey told a House panel:

The FBI says it has opened a criminal investigation of the Veterans Affairs Department, which is grappling with a scandal over long waiting lists to provide care and allegations that paperwork was faked to make delays appear shorter.

FBI Director James Comey told a House hearing on Wednesday the bureau’s Phoenix office has joined an ongoing review by the VA inspector general.

The move at least partly satisfies requests from key members of Congress from both parties who have pressed for a full probe by the Justice Department as the scandal accelerated in recent weeks and led to the resignation of VA Secretary Eric Shinseki in May.

The number of facilities now under investigation by the IG has increased to 69, so the FBI may be very busy indeed. The indications from the VA’s own internal investigation is that the fraud was endemic, and that’s just not going to be possible without some direction from the main office. Anderson Cooper got an update from Drew Griffin last night after the hearing concluded:

Also, Jake Tapper reports that two members of Congress now accuse the VA of obstructing their own probe into the VA scandal:

After stories emerged of long waiting lists for veterans trying to get appointments for health care within the VA system, on May 28, Rep. Tim Murphy, R-Pennsylvania, received an unusual phone call from Pittsburgh VA director and CEO Terry Gerigk Wolf and deputy director David Cord, sources tell CNN.

Cord told Murphy, the congressman says, that an internal audit indicated that the Pittsburgh VA “passed with flying colors,” with the exception of those veterans seeking appointments in podiatry.

“I don’t believe that,” Murphy said, according to people on the call.

Murphy says he was taken off guard by the phone call. Officials with the Pittsburgh VA – which has had significant problems in the past, with an outbreak of Legionnaire’s Disease in 2011 and 2012 that left at least six veterans dead – never independently picks up the phone to call him, his staffers say.

“It is my belief the purpose of the unannounced call was not to provide me the facts on patient wait times at the Pittsburgh VA, but was a smokescreen to prevent me from understanding what exactly was going on there,” Murphy told CNN. “I’ve heard the ‘all is okay’ message in midst of management failures too many times from the VA to believe it on face value ever again.”

The congressman compared notes with his fellow western Pennsylvanian, Democratic Rep. Mike Doyle.

Doyle said that Wolf had told him something quite different – that Pittsburgh had up to 700 patients on this wait list, called the NEAR (New Enrollee Appointment Request) List, for veterans enrolling for the first time. Some of these veterans had been waiting years for their first appointment.

Doyle and Murphy say they called Wolf, who told them she knew about the list three weeks before, but was told not to inform the congressional delegation about it for fear she would be fired for disclosing the information.

As the FBI formally enters the scandal for the first time, the Senate passed the Sanders-McCain reform act by a 93-3 vote. The House has passed a similar bill unanimously, and the normal means to reconcile the two will be a conference committee. How formal that process will need to be remains to be seen:

Some differences will have to be reconciled, but lawmakers and aides expect that can be done without a lengthy formal conference and predicted that each chamber will simply moderately alter their bills to clear both the House and Senate. Both chambers have taken slightly different paths on how to fire incompetent VA executives, for example, with the Senate concerned the House is removing due process from firing decisions.

But on health care, there is not much daylight between the two proposals. The Senate’s bill boosts hiring of doctors and nurses, authorizes the leasing of 27 new VA medical facilities and allow veterans to seek private health care outside the VA system if necessary — provisions mostly in line with the House-passed bill. Adding to the VA momentum, the White House issued a statement on Wednesday supporting the Senate’s bill.

Even small differences might be easier to bridge in conference, rather than have amendments go through normal order to bring the language into concordance in each chamber. The point, though, is that this is moving fast — and that speed puts pressure on the VA and the FBI to move with haste as well.

Speaking of pressure, Barack Obama’s certainly getting some for his handling of the scandal too:

As the situation continues to unfold at the VA, 29% of all Americans say they approve of the way Obama is handling the situation involving veterans at VA hospitals, with 63% disapproving. When asked to rate the president on a variety of issues, more Americans approve of his handling of other issues, including the environment (47%), terrorism (42%), and the release of U.S. Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl (38%). While approval is not high on any of these matters, the rather low rating of Obama’s handling of the VA scandal is significant, especially paired with how closely Americans are following the issue.

Gallup notes that it’s not impacting his overall approval rating … yet. It’s certainly not helping it, though.


Related Posts:

Source from: hotair

Saturday, June 7, 2014

Video: Court documents show San Francisco suspect bought poisons

Video:CourtdocumentsshowSanFranciscosuspectbought

Video: Court documents show San Francisco suspect bought poisons

posted at 10:01 am on June 7, 2014 by Ed Morrissey

The strange case of Ryan Kelly Chamberlain II got even stranger yesterday after court documents in the case of the now-captured political activist were made public. On the run for a short period, during which he posted what had appeared to be a suicide note on social media, police and the FBI caught Chamberlain on Monday after patrons at a local bar recognized him from television coverage. Now we know why the FBI took an interest in the former social-media consultant in the first place:

Bomb technicians found a series of items in his house, leading to a manhunt that ended with his arrest Monday. Items included a powdery, green explosive substance, a model rocket motor, ball bearings and an igniter for home-made bombs, according to a different affidavit unsealed earlier this week. It did not list deadly toxins at the time.

But the latest documents detail lethal poisons bought anonymously in dark, encrypted corners of the Web.

“The investigation has revealed that Chamberlain has utilized an anonymous, Internet-based market place known as Black Market Reloaded to facility the unlawful acquisition and possession of biological agents and lethal toxins in California and Florida,” FBI agent Michael Eldridge wrote in the latest documents.

Chamberlain bought abrin from a seller in Sacramento in December, the documents allege. He said he planned to use the poison to “ease the suffering” of cancer patients, according to the documents.

The FBI followed up with the seller in May:

In May, agents questioned a Black Market vendor of toxins, improvised explosives and guns from Sacramento who told agents that he had done business with Chamberlain. The seller said Chamberlain asked for samples of pure abrin to help ease the suffering of cancer patients, according to the affidavit.

The vendor instead sold him two clear vials of ground rosary peas, which can be converted into abrin, the affidavit said. The vials contained enough peas to create hundreds of lethal doses of the toxin.

There is no antidote for abrin, either. Chamberlain apparently represented himself as someone who wanted to help cancer patients, but as KTVU reports, he also asked questions about whether abrin was detectable in an autopsy on someone who had been killed with it:

Chamberlain also bought enough pure nicotine to use in a lethal attack, according to the court records.

These developments still leave a few questions. If Chamberlain bought these in December and the FBI began its investigation in May, that seems like a long time for Chamberlain to have held onto this stuff without trying to use it — unless they suspect that he might have used it, but for now no connection to any suspicious death has been alleged. The investigation started with a raid on the seller, which turned up the records of the sale to Chamberlain, so this might be a case of pure luck in finding a potential domestic terrorist — or is it just a case of clinical depression? That’s the argument Chamberlain’s lawyers made in court:

The lack of an actual attack might demonstrate that the purchase was part of a clinical pathology rather than an intent to commit terrorist acts, but we don’t know what else the FBI might have found on that investigation, either. If it was the former, why would Chamberlain have been so particular about getting pure abrin — to the point of buying his own rosary peas to make it himself? On the other hand, why go for something so exotic that any personal connection to it would tend to be prima facie evidence of guilt? Pathology, or just stupidity?


Related Posts:

Source from: hotair

Monday, June 2, 2014

Video: FBI looking for political activist on the run for possessing explosives

Video:FBIlookingforpoliticalactivistonthe

Video: FBI looking for political activist on the run for possessing explosives

posted at 10:01 am on June 2, 2014 by Ed Morrissey

Saturday, the FBI put out a national alert for Ryan Kelly Chamberlain, a former consultant on political campaigns for both Republicans and Democrats, and a University of San Francisco instructor of a “Grass Roots Mobilization” course for post-grads. Initially, rumors of ricin production arose, but the FBI threw a dash of cold water on those reports. A raid on Chamberlain’s home may have produced explosives, and the fugitive is considered armed and dangerous as long as he’s on the run:

The FBI has issued a nationwide alert to law enforcement agencies about a San Francisco social media consultant they consider armed and dangerous who is wanted on suspicion of possessing explosives.

FBI spokesman Peter Lee said Sunday that 42-year-old Ryan Kelly Chamberlain, II, was last seen in a dark blue, hooded sweatshirt and jeans.

Multiple agencies, including hazardous materials crews, searched Chamberlain’s apartment in San Francisco’s Russian Hill neighborhood on Saturday, blocking off the street to vehicle and pedestrian traffic for much of the day.

Readers have to dive to the end of the CBS/AP article to find this information:

Chamberlain had worked for years as a political consultant on Democratic campaigns, Bramblett said.

He also worked as an independent contractor for The San Francisco Chronicle during the 2012 NFL season, doing social media to boost coverage for the San Francisco 49ers Insider iPad app, the newspaper said.

A spokeswoman for the University of San Francisco said Chamberlain taught a “Grass Roots Mobilization” course to graduate students in the Public Affairs program in 2011. Anne-Marie Devine said Chamberlain taught for one semester, and wasn’t invited to teach another course. She said she didn’t know why, because hundreds of adjunct professors come and go at the university.

However, KTVU in Oakland also interviewed a Republican Party figure who noted that Chamberlain did work for the GOP before “switching sides,” and did his last work on Gavin Newsom’s campaign:

That doesn’t sound like the profile of a really far-left political activist. It sounds more like the profile of a political realist in California, and someone who knew where the money would be in consultancies for political campaigns.

The FBI made a statement about this yesterday, and conducted a brief press conference afterward:

His friends are shocked, saying they never considered him violent or dangerous, although one person remarked that Chamberlain seemed petty and immature about not getting his way. This story is a long way from being over, but I’d be careful about shoehorning it into a partisan framework, at least for the moment.


Related Posts:

Source from: hotair

Tuesday, April 15, 2014

Boston, a year later, and not many more answers

Boston,ayearlater,andnotmanymore

Boston, a year later, and not many more answers

posted at 2:01 pm on April 15, 2014 by Ed Morrissey

A year ago today, two bombs exploded at the Boston Marathon finish line, killing three people and wounding 264 others gathered at the annual sporting event. Within days, investigators identified the two bombers and Boston ended up in a lockdown while law enforcement tried to capture them. One died in a firefight, while the other finally surrendered after the lockdown, when a local man finally had an opportunity to notice that someone had tampered with his boat in his backyard. Within a few weeks, we found out plenty about Tamerlan and Dzhokar Tsarnaev — the older brother’s lengthy trip to Dagestan, where Islamist extremists operate, and the FBI missed a couple of opportunities to identify Tamerlan as a threat.

Since then, though, we haven’t heard much about the case. Last week, the Inspector General of the combined intel community absolved the FBI for the missed opportunities, blaming the Russians for a lack of cooperation. Otherwise, the story has been largely static for months, and probably would be today if not for the anniversary. Boston commemorated the attack this morning with a rolling ceremony that emphasized hope and resilience:

On the anniversary of last year’s bombings at the Boston Marathon, this city paused Tuesday to honor those who had been killed and wounded and to demonstrate its defiance and resilience in the face of the attack.

The day began with a 7 a.m. service of “remembrance, reflection and renewal” in the chapel of Massachusetts General Hospital, one of several hospitals pressed into service last April 15 in response to the sudden carnage at the marathon finish line.

Later, on Boylston Street, with bagpipers playing “Amazing Grace,” wreaths were placed near the site of the explosions. Gov. Deval Patrick and other dignitaries stood quietly as Mayor Martin Walsh helped Jane and Henry Richard, whose 8-year-old brother Martin was killed in the bombing, place the wreaths. Jane Richard lost a leg in the explosion; her parents were also seriously hurt. The only words spoken were a prayer from Cardinal Sean P. O’Malley. …

The major tribute of the day is to take place at noon at the Hynes Convention Center on Boylston Street, not far from the finish line, where two homemade bombs last year killed three people and wounded more than 260, some of them gravely. Sixteen people had limbs amputated.

Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. is scheduled to speak at the tribute, as are Gov. Deval Patrick, Mayor Martin J. Walsh of Boston and Thomas M. Menino, who was mayor when the bombers struck.

But what about finding more on the Tsarnaevs — their motives, their connections, and how they managed to elude counterterrorism officials? Thomas Jocelyn wonders the same thing at The Daily Beast:

One year ago today, two backpack bombs were detonated at the Boston Marathon, killing three people. More than 260 others were wounded or maimed. In the months since, many man-hours have been spent investigating the accused perpetrators of the bombings, Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. However, a key question remains unanswered: did the brothers have any substantive ties to terrorists abroad?

The extent of the confusion surrounding this basic question is troubling. Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the elder brother, is known to have traveled to Dagestan for several months in 2012. Credible press reports say that he was in contact with extremists participating in the insurgency against the Russian government there.  But the U.S. government still has not provided the American public with a detailed summary of Tamerlan’s overseas contacts. And the press’s reporting does not clarify matters.

Another open question is how the police and FBI handled the manhunt. NBC reports that the police response was strong – too strong, in fact. Police fired so many rounds and in such a haphazard manner that the injuries at the initial gunfight turned out to all be friendly-fire incidents — and while the Tsarnaevs threw home-made bombs at the police, they may have fired as few as ten shots in the entire melee:

In effect, the suspects ended up at the center of a ring of cops on Laurel Street between Dexter and School streets during the 20-minute firefight, and the bullets that were fired at them often hit near the officers on the other side.

“Certainly not a good idea,” said Davis. “They see somebody shooting, so they fire at them. That’s their training.”

Police training dictates that officers consider several key factors when making the decision to fire their weapons. They must assess the danger posed to bystanders, residents and fellow officers, they should know the position of fellow officers and they should stop to reassess the situation if they can, rather than simply continuing to pull the trigger.

But on Laurel Street, rounds flew into parked cars and police vehicles and chewed up fences and trees. A round entered the home of Andrew Kitzenberg on the north side of the street and lodged in a chair. Another ripped through the exterior wall of Adam Andrew and Megan Marrer’s house and landed on their living room floor.

More than a dozen officers suffered minor injuries during the mayhem, but none was believed to have been wounded by the suspects. The only serious wound was suffered by Richard Donohue, a transit cop with the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, who was hit in the groin by a police bullet and began to bleed profusely.

The big problem was a flood of volunteer off-duty officers who did not get clear leadership and direction in either of the two standoffs. The second, where the younger Tsarnaev hid in the boat, turned into a one-sided hail of bullets based on a misunderstanding and a lack of direct control:

The commander on scene was able to deploy the tactical team and establish a perimeter, says the report, but his control was only partial because there were so many extra, “self-deployed” bodies arriving. …

At around 7 p.m., a voice on the police radio issued a warning, “There’s a perp in the boat trying to poke a hole in the liner, a perp in the boat. Live party who may be trying to object out, live party in the boat confirmed.”

Tsarnaev was pushing a long, thin object up through the boat covering. The object later turned out to be a fishing gaff, which Tsarnaev may have been trying to use to push up the tarp so he could see out.

But one of the snipers on the roof saw the object and began shooting. It sparked a round of what is known as “contagious fire,” where other officers with their fingers on the trigger began peppering the boat with bullets.

The commander began shouting for the officers to cease fire, but the fusillade went on for 10 seconds. Hundreds of rounds were expended.

In fairness, this was a truly exceptional set of circumstances, and the main goal on everyone’s mind was to stop these two before they could launch another attack. No one knew what the Tsarnaevs had in their car (and they did have more bombs, used in the firefight), or what Dzhokar had in the boat, either. The volunteerism demonstrated by police should be hailed, as they selflessly put themselves in the way of two terrorists. But what this does show is the need to have tight control over armed and deployed forces, even those trained to respond to such crises.

Meanwhile, the younger brother awaits trial, which has been tentatively scheduled for November. It may depend on whether his defense team offers an insanity plea, which would be a big long shot, given the obvious attempts to get away and to fight off the police. Bloomberg News discusses the status of the trial, and also an interesting system put in place for the Boston Marathon and beyond — a surveillance system that constantly looks for “behaviors” in street crowds and mass transit systems:

We eventually might want some answers about that system, too.


Related Posts:

Source from: hotair

Thursday, April 10, 2014

New IG report blames Russia for withholding info on Boston Marathon bomber

NewIGreportblamesRussiaforwithholdinginfo

New IG report blames Russia for withholding info on Boston Marathon bomber

posted at 9:21 am on April 10, 2014 by Ed Morrissey

What did Russia know, and when did it know it, about the two brothers who launched a terrorist attack on the Boston Marathon a year ago? As the anniversary date approaches, a new report from the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community largely lets the FBI off the hook for not identifying Tamerlan Tsarnaev as a domestic threat. Instead, the IG finds that Russia withheld critical information from the US about Tsarnaev’s activities, including a phone call recording in which the older brother discussed Islamic jihad … with his mother, as the New York Times reports:

Russian officials had told the F.B.I. in 2011 that the suspect, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, “was a follower of radical Islam and a strong believer” and that Mr. Tsarnaev “had changed drastically since 2010 as he prepared to leave the United States for travel to the country’s region to join unspecified underground groups.”

But after an initial investigation by the F.B.I., the Russians declined several requests for additional information about Mr. Tsarnaev, according to the report, a review of how intelligence and law enforcement agencies could have thwarted the bombing.

At the time, American law enforcement officials believed that Mr. Tsarnaev posed a far greater threat to Russia.

The new inspector general’s report found that it was only after the bombing occurred last April that the Russians shared with the F.B.I. the additional intelligence, including information from a telephone conversation the Russian authorities had intercepted between Mr. Tsarnaev and his mother in which they discussed Islamic jihad.

The IG concludes that the FBI did a proper investigation with the information they received, but they could have worked a little harder to expand their knowledge of the Tsarnaevs, too:

While the review largely exonerates the F.B.I., it does say that agents in the Boston area who investigated the Russian intelligence in 2011 could have conducted a few more interviews when they first examined the information.

Despite the elder Tsarnaev’s travels to Dagestan and his apparent connections to unrest in the region, neither the FBI nor the IG could find any evidence that Tsarnaev or his brother Dzokhar belonged to a terrorist organization. They acted on their own volition, it seems. Without the two Tsarnaevs connecting to a wider network for support in this attack, it’s doubtful that the FBI could have stopped it all by themselves, either.

That doesn’t mean that the FBI should be let off the hook entirely, though. One senior official called them “homegrown violent extremists,” but that’s not quite the case either. The months-long trip that Tamerlan took to Dagestan had to have played a significant role in his radicalization. If anything, the lesson from that information is that foreign-born American residents who stay for months in areas known for radical Islamist violence should come under more scrutiny than Tsarnaev did, regardless of how much information the governments of those regions share.

Lindsey Graham called this failure “a mistake” after the trip to Dagestan became public knowledge, saying, “It’s people like this that you don’t want to let out of your sight.” Hopefully we’ve learned that lesson now.

CNN also reported on the IG’s conclusions this morning:


Related Posts:

Source from: hotair

Monday, March 31, 2014

The FBI isn’t breaking up with the SPLC — it’s just not keeping the relationship “official”

TheFBIisn’tbreakingupwiththeSPLC

The FBI isn’t breaking up with the SPLC — it’s just not keeping the relationship “official”

posted at 12:01 pm on March 31, 2014 by Dustin Siggins

Last week, the FBI received a lot of attention and praise from conservative sources for finally eliminating the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) from its website’s list of “hate crimes” resources. However, while a headline at Breitbart says the FBI “dumps [SPLC] as hate crimes resource,” and an article at The Daily Caller said the FBI was “breaking ties” with the SPLC, a public statement from the FBI and the agency’s own website indicate the removal may mean just that — removal from the site, not a diminishing of the relationship between the two organizations. From my article on the subject last Thursday:

Apparently bowing to pressure from pro-family organizations, the FBI and the U.S. Army have removed the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) as a “hate crimes” resource on their websites. However, comments from the FBI indicate they may continue using SPLC as a resource.

An FBI spokesperson told LifeSiteNews that their Civil Rights program now “only provides links to resources within the federal government.”

“While we appreciate the tremendous support we receive from a variety of organizations, we have elected not to identify those groups on the civil rights page,” the spokesperson added.

Justin Higgins of JHPolitics.com sees the same problem I do — the spokesperson’s statement indicates the change may just be a public relations move, not a substantive shift in FBI policy:

We should not be so quick to assume that the Obama Department of Justice isn’t continuing to work with radical left-wing outlets like SPLC. Removing a few links from a website is a good start, but this battle is not over until our government stops the blatant assault on conservative and Christian groups. That means a formal end to the SPLC having input on what constitutes “hate” in the United States. There is no evidence that their input has been mitigated.

Media Matters came to the same conclusion, noting that the FBI probably isn’t breaking off its partnership since it still lists the SPLC and other outside groups — including other far-left organizations such as the National Organization for Women and the Human Rights Campaign — on its overview page:

Public Outreach: The FBI has forged partnerships nationally and locally with many civil rights organizations to establish rapport, share information, address concerns, and cooperate in solving problems. These groups include such organizations as the NAACP, the Southern Poverty Law Center, the Anti-Defamation League, the National Asian Pacific American Legal Consortium, the National Organization for Women, the Human Rights Campaign, and the National Disability Rights Network.

The FBI’s close ties with the SPLC actually go back further than the Obama administration, to at least 2007, when the federal government partnered with the group to examine unsolved Civil Rights-era racial crimes. That relationship has expanded under President Obama, to the point where the SPLC was involved in anti-Christian information being given out to soldiers. That policy was sharply opposed by Army Secretary John McHugh last year, and the Army rightly ignored the SPLC’s call to put the American Family Association on its list of organizations soldiers cannot join while in service.

Of course, the FBI shouldn’t be working with the SPLC at all. In addition to the SPLC’s influence on the gunman who attacked the Family Research Council’s headquarters in 2012, their definition of “hate groups” is far more expansive than the FBI’s definition of a “hate crime”:

Under federal law, according to the FBI, “[a] hate crime is a traditional offense like murder, arson, or vandalism with an added element of bias. … Hate itself is not a crime—and the FBI is mindful of protecting freedom of speech and other civil liberties.”

However, according to the SPLC, “Hate groups have beliefs or practices that attack or malign an entire class of people, typically for their immutable characteristics.” It also says that “hate group activities can include criminal acts, marches, rallies, speeches, meetings, leafleting or publishing. … Listing here does not imply a group advocates or engages in violence or other criminal activity.”

Ignoring the question of whether “hate crime” laws should exist in the first place, this definitional difference is problematic. However, as one critic notes, the SPLC is all but the only organization of its kind in the country, and therefore it has enormous influence in the media and elsewhere.

While some might take the FBI’s move as good news, the agency seems more likely it is simply keeping the relationship off the Internet. Not only does the spokesperson’s statement indicates the FBI will continue to work with the SPLC (and the Anti-Defamation League, which was also removed from the FBI’s resource page), but now it will be done away from the public’s eye. So rather than a break-up, it looks like the relationship has simply become more clandestine. This is not good for transparency, especially given the other far-left groups the FBI has partnerships with.

Note: Be sure to check out Higgins’ website. Not only does he have a name almost as cool as mine, the blog he founded and runs has solid commentary on national politics and the Virginia Senate race.

Dustin Siggins is the Washington, D.C. Correspondent for Lifesitenews.com and formerly the primary blogger with Tea Party Patriots. He is a co-author of the forthcoming book, Bankrupt Legacy: The Future of the Debt-Paying Generation. His work has been published by numerous online and print publications, including USA Today, Roll Call, Hot Air, Huffington Post, Mediaite, and First Things.


Related Posts:

Source from: hotair

Friday, March 14, 2014

Has DoJ blocked a corruption probe into Reid, Lee?

HasDoJblockedacorruptionprobeintoReid,

Has DoJ blocked a corruption probe into Reid, Lee?

posted at 8:41 am on March 14, 2014 by Ed Morrissey

Late yesterday, ABC News and the Washington Times both reported that Utah prosecutors have been working with the FBI on allegations of corruption involving two US Senators — who at first blush could not be more opposite. Majority Leader Harry Reid and Senator Mike Lee have almost nothing in common politically, but may be connected to corruption tracked in Utah involving the online-gambling industry. ABC’s Brian Ross spoke to the two Utah prosecutors — one Republican, one Democrat — who want the Department of Justice to open a broader investigation of Reid and Lee:


ABC Entertainment News | ABC Business News

Two local prosecutors in Utah say a corruption investigation looking at state politicians and online gambling interests has yielded evidence that could implicate Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, and Senator Mike Lee, R-Utah.

The two district attorneys – one Democrat and one Republican – already working with a team of FBI agents, are urging federal prosecutors to pick up the case and investigate – something the Department of Justice has thus far declined to do.

The Utah officials say the evidence relates to suspect campaign contributions and other financial transactions.

Reid, a liberal Democrat, and Lee, a rising star in Republican politics, could not be more opposite politically but both have ties to the on-line poker world, the prosecutors say.

This isn’t the first time a connection between Reid and Lee has arisen, John Solomon reports at the Washington Times, and it concerned Democrats at the time:

The investigative efforts have been further complicated by the fact that Mr. Reid worked to get Mr. Lee’s chief counsel, David Barlow, confirmed in 2011 as the U.S. attorney in Salt Lake City. That action — a Democratic Senate leader letting a Republican be named to a key prosecutor’s position in the Obama administration — raised many eyebrows and angered some Democrats.

Subsequently, the entire office of federal prosecutors in Utah was forced to recuse itself from the corruption case after questions surfaced about a conflict of interest involving one prosecutor and a subject of the probe. After the recusal, state prosecutors secured a court order transferring the federal evidence gathered up to that point to their possession.

The process has left FBI agents in the unusual position of trying to help two local prosecutors make a case in state court without the ability to use the federal court system to determine whether accusations against two powerful members of Congress are true.

That’s not the only “unusual position” that the FBI has had to take in this case. Normally, these kinds of allegations would go to a federal grand jury for further development, quarterbacked by the DoJ’s public integrity section. Instead, the DoJ has refused to do anything with the case:

The probe, conducted by one Republican and one Democratic state prosecutor in Utah, has received accusations from an indicted businessman and political donor, interviewed other witnesses and gathered preliminary evidence such as financial records, Congressional Record statements and photographs that corroborate some aspects of the accusations, officials have told The Washington Times and ABC News.

But the Justice Department’s public integrity section — which normally handles corruption cases involving elected figures — rejected FBI agents’ bid to use a federal grand jury and subpoenas to determine whether the accusations are true and whether any federal crimes were committed by state and federal officials.

The FBI is “frustrated” by the lack of cooperation at Justice in the probe:

People familiar with the probe said both FBI agents and local investigators have been frustrated for months by the Justice Department’s inaction on the initial accusations and evidence against the two senators, and those concerns were recently elevated to FBI headquarters.

The special agent in charge of the Utah office was summoned earlier this month to Washington to meet with senior FBI officials, and the bureau’s Utah office has been instructed that the FBI agents working the case may only assist in the state probe and cannot pursue federal criminal investigative leads — unless Justice finally approves a corruption probe.

The frustrations have prompted discussions of seeking a special prosecutor who would bypass the Justice Department and U.S. attorney’s office and evaluate the evidence independently. …

“But in this case, DOJ risks creating the perception of a cover-up rather than let agents use the normal tools and follow the evidence wherever it leads — Republican, Democrat, Senate or not,” the senior FBI official said.

The prosecutors have evidence that both Senators conducted pay-for-play efforts with donors and fundraisers, apparently in connection with online gambling interests, whose lobbyists are currently making a big push on Capitol Hill to legalize the industry in the US. Reid flipped his position on that and even introduced legislation to legalize online poker, but it didn’t go far, and the probe found evidence in a wiretap that Reid might have been paid off to do that. Lee’s issues deal with the sale of his home to a federal contractor and campaign contributor at a big loss, which his bank ended up absorbing.

Both Reid and Lee deny any wrongdoing, and the public-integrity section has had its issues with overzealous prosecution in the past, most notably with Ted Stevens. However, if the DoJ refuses to take any action when state prosecutors and its own FBI says a case needs more investigation, then we may not bother having a public-integrity section at the DoJ at all.


Related Posts:

Source from: hotair