Showing posts with label General Motors. Show all posts
Showing posts with label General Motors. Show all posts

Monday, June 30, 2014

GM to recall 8.2 million more vehicles over ignition-switch defect

GMtorecall8.2millionmorevehiclesover

GM to recall 8.2 million more vehicles over ignition-switch defect

posted at 3:21 pm on June 30, 2014 by Ed Morrissey

The recall blues continue at GM, as does the scope of their previously hidden ignition-switch defect.  The world’s largest automaker added 8.45 million more vehicles to its list, with some models going back to 1997. This puts GM over the 28-million mark for cars recalled on a global basis in 2014, and over 26 million domestic:

General Motors Co. (GM), which has already called back more than 20 million cars in North America for various fixes this year, recalled 8.45 million more today for defects including ignitions and electrical malfunctions.

GM is recalling 8.23 million cars for unintended ignition key rotation, including Chevrolet Malibus from 1997 to 2005 and Cadillac CTS cars from the 2003 to 2014 model years. Among the vehicles recalled today, GM said it’s aware of seven crashes, eight injuries and three fatalities. The fatal crashes occurred in older full-size sedans being recalled for the ignition flaw.

It isn’t clear whether the faulty ignition caused those crashes GM said.

Recalls don’t come cheap, either. This recall will cost the automaker an additional $500 million, adding to the $700 million charge it took in the second quarter for the previous recalls. That’s a big loss for a defect known to GM long before the bailout, and known to the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) during it.

That’s why some investors are likely also saying, “Are you kidding me?” Treasury divested itself of its GM stock in December, just coincidentally before all of the defects became important enough to address. The people who bought that stock had no idea that GM would need to pull 27 million vehicles off the road for critical repairs, but the question will be whether the NHTSA and Obama administration knew about it before dumping their stock. Had any individual investor done that, he’d be looking at a criminal probe from the SEC.

The CNBC analyst asks a good question about GM cars: How many are still on the road? That Subaru lease is looking better and better, I tell you …

Ironically, just an hour or so earlier, Yahoo noted that GM was “restoring trust“:

Since some of the crashes involving Chevrolet Cobalts, Saturn Ions and several other vehicle types occurred years ago — before GM publicly acknowledged the problem — it may be impossible to prove the dodgy ignition switch was a factor. So GM could be stingy with payouts if it chooses to.

But that would defeat the purpose of a compensation fund meant to restore trust with customers. Plus, GM has waived its right to deny liability in cases that occurred before July 2009, when past liabilities were transferred to a husk company as part of GM’s bankruptcy proceedings. Had GM stuck by those terms, victims could have lodged claims against the “old GM” but would have become mere creditors seeking pennies on the dollar from an entity set up to liquidate assets GM shed in Chapter 11. Feinberg’s plan will almost certainly offer more-generous outcomes than that, allowing GM CEO Mary Barra to argue that GM has fulfilled her promise to honor its “civic duty.”

From a financial perspective, however, GM still faces two big challenges. One is a spate of class-action lawsuits filed on behalf of GM customers whose cars may have lost value by being associated with the ignition controversy. So far, GM has recalled nearly 8 million vehicles with the faulty part. One such suit, seeking $10 billion or more in damages, claims the ignition scandal has shaved $500 to $2,600 off the value of a variety of GM vehicles now in the hands of owners. …

Despite the bumpy road ahead, investors seem confident GM will regain cruising speed. The company’s share price is basically the same as it was in early February, when GM announced the first recall involving the ignition switch. And GM sales have remained strong, largely because its current lineup of vehicles is a leap ahead of the shoddy Cobalts and Ions that left the line with the faulty switch. GM, in fact, doesn’t even make those vehicles any more. Sooner or later, the automaker will outrun its troubled past.

There may come a day when GM outruns its “troubled past,” restores confidence and trust with the consumer, and doesn’t issue recalls by the millions. Clearly, though, today is not that day.

Update: There was some confusion over the headline, which noted 8.45 million recalls overall — today. I took that out, as the real “overall” figure is now well above 28 million (a figure I also corrected).


Related Posts:

Source from: hotair

Monday, March 31, 2014

GM recall expands again (again)

GMrecallexpandsagain(again) postedat

GM recall expands again (again)

posted at 10:01 am on March 31, 2014 by Gabriel Malor

Friday morning, Ed covered the expanding GM recall related to faulty ignition switches. That recall now reaches 2.6 million GM vehicles from model years 2003-2011.  By the end of the day Friday, two more recalls raised that number to almost 5 million. The first new recall applies to the transmissions of 2014 Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra 1500 pickup trucks, and 2015 Chevrolet Suburban and Tahoe SUVs and GMC Yukon and Yukon XL SUVs.

The second new recall applies to Chevrolet Cruze compact cars, which apparently have a bad right front axle shaft. Get this, some of the bad shafts were installed during a previous recall for the Cruze.

Watch:

GM CEO Mary Barra will testify on Tuesday and Wednesday to House and Senate committees looking into the recalls. Of particular interest will be determining whether GM was aware of the problems before gaining immunity from liability as it came out of bankruptcy in 2009. Were courts to find that the company had engaged in bankruptcy fraud, “new GM” would be on the hook for “old GM’s” liabilities. I would also expect the SEC to get involved at some point, since new GM has been trading shares (including a $10 billion loss to taxpayers) on the theory that it was protected from old GM’s debts, something that may unravel if courts find it engaged in fraud.


Related Posts:

Source from: hotair

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

Obama on GM bailout: “Today, that bet has paid off.”

ObamaonGMbailout:“Today,thatbethas

Obama on GM bailout: “Today, that bet has paid off.”

posted at 9:41 am on December 10, 2013 by Erika Johnsen

I felt the need to post this as an addendum to last night’s news that the federal government has finally sold off their remaining shares in General Motors, mostly because President Obama and his administration’s constant commandeering of economic language that has no place in the realm of the public sector irks me to no end. From the official White House statement:

“When I took office, the American auto industry – the heartbeat of American manufacturing – was on the verge of collapse.  Two of the Big Three – GM and Chrysler – were on the brink of failure, threatening to take suppliers, distributors and entire communities down with them.  In the midst of what was already the worst recession since the Great Depression, another one million Americans were in danger of losing their jobs.

As President, I refused to let that happen.  I refused to walk away from American workers and an iconic American industry.  But in exchange for rescuing and retooling GM and Chrysler with taxpayer dollars, we demanded responsibility and results.  In 2011, we marked the end of an important chapter as Chrysler repaid every dime and more of what it owed the American taxpayers from the investment we made under my Administration’s watch.  Today, we’re closing the book by selling the remaining shares of the federal government’s investment in General Motors.  GM has now repaid every taxpayer dollar my Administration committed to its rescue, plus billions invested by the previous Administration.

Less than five years later, each of the Big Three automakers is now strong enough to stand on its own.  They’re profitable for the first time in nearly a decade.  The industry has added more than 372,000 new jobs – its strongest growth since the 1990s.  Thanks to the workers on our assembly lines, some of the most high-tech, fuel-efficient cars in the world are once again designed, engineered, and built right here in America – and the rest of the world is buying more of them than ever before.

Yes, because a $10 billion loss on the part of that ever-munificent and conveniently faceless benefactor, the taxpayers, is a mere pittance, am I right?

This bailout was not a “bet” or an “investment” in any traditional financial sense of the word. This was not the introduction of good old-fashioned and prosperity-generating free-market competition, but rather the deliberate thwarting of it. President Obama adores the term “investment” as a rhetorical substitute for what, in just about every instance he has applied it, has been little more than straight-up corporate pork (the Department of Energy’s green-energy loan guarantee program springs immediately to mind). It’s not an investment when the federal government has the power to deliberately manipulate market conditions to favor certain players over others, and over the deviating wishes of consumers. It really is just venture socialism.

And I must say, I had no idea we could distinguish between GM’s repayment of “every taxpayer dollar my Administration committed to its rescue, plus billions invested by the previous Administration,” rather than simply a lump sum owed to the federal government, nor that the distinction would convey a single iota of actual meaning rather than acting as an empty rhetorical flourish, since his administration enthusiastically doubled down on the practice …but, meh. If President Obama says there is, it’s probably legit.


Related Posts:

Source from: hotair

Monday, December 9, 2013

Treasury sells off the last of its GM stock at a $10 billion taxpayer loss

TreasurysellsoffthelastofitsGM

Treasury sells off the last of its GM stock at a $10 billion taxpayer loss

posted at 7:41 pm on December 9, 2013 by Erika Johnsen

And with that, it’s “Government Motors” no more. At least, not officially.

U.S. taxpayers no longer own any of automaker General Motors. The Treasury sold the last of its remaining 31.1 million GM shares today.

The taxpayer loss on the GM bailout finishes at $10.5 billion. The Treasury department said it recovered $39 billion from selling its GM stock, and had put $49.5 billion of taxpayer money into the GM bailout. …

GM and Chrysler both went through government-scripted Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganizations. Treasury put $12.3 billion into Chrysler and recovered $11.13 billion of that.

The big argument by Obama officials and bailout apologists everywhere, of course, is that on net evaluation the $10 billion direct hit taxpayers are taking on this is well worth the jobs and economic infrastructure that the federal government “saved” on behalf of the Detroit auto companies, and ergo, this was a wise move and big subsequent win for the American economy.

“Inaction could have cost the broader economy more than one million jobs, billions in lost personal savings, and significantly reduced economic production,” Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew said in a statement announcing that Treasury had sold all its remaining shares.

…But, we can never really know that, can we? Certainly the implosion of these companies would have caused a lot of very real material pain at the outset, but creative destruction and the opportunity to fail are as much a part of an economy’s long-term success as anything else. The precedent for massive corporate bailouts is now set, and General Motors is the lucky benefactor of competition deliberately denied from other companies, global and domestic, who made better business decisions and/or offered a superior product. Obama’s supporters are quick to point to “the rescue” of the U.S. auto industry as one of his greatest presidential achievements (which, to me, is an indicator of how tough it must be for them to scrape together a list of his presidential achievements, but I digress), but this entire situation is one of the many means through which President Obama has opened the door to Big Business rent-seeking and cronyism capitalism at the expense of both the Little Guy and the American economy at large.


Related Posts:

Source from: hotair