Showing posts with label railroad. Show all posts
Showing posts with label railroad. Show all posts

Sunday, July 6, 2014

Florida company eyes next big rail project

Floridacompanyeyesnextbigrailproject

Florida company eyes next big rail project

posted at 6:31 pm on July 6, 2014 by Jazz Shaw

We’ve discussed plenty of ill conceived transportation projects here, but there’s one in Florida which may be kicking off soon which might not seem quite as crazy. A Sunshine State company is seeking to re-start a passenger train line running from Orlando to Miami with stops in some of the major tourist and population centers along the way, running down the Atlantic coast. And they think they can have it running in less than two years.

In the most notable attempt to revive private intercity passenger-rail service in at least four decades, freight-rail company Florida East Coast Industries—owned by Fortress Investment Group LLC-managed funds—is planning to start construction in coming weeks on a $2.3 billion passenger-train line it is calling All Aboard Florida. The train would offer a roughly three-hour ride between Miami and Orlando, with stops in West Palm Beach and Fort Lauderdale.

Although the project faces a host of challenges—including an environmental review, some residents’ opposition and uncertain federal backing—FECI is betting that the clogged highways, frustrating airport waits and growing demand to live in cities will allow the company to fill seats. The company says the fares will be less expensive than flying—which run more than $150 one-way—and competitive with the costs of driving. It hopes to have its first trains running by 2016.

While not entirely sunshine and unicorns, this project looks significantly different than the now $64B California high speed rail boondoggle which Ed has covered so thoroughly. First of all, this isn’t some space age, light rail or magnetic field Buzz Lightyear project, but rather standard (albeit rather fast) passenger train service primarily on existing rail lines with some repairs and improvements. Also, it’s at least a mostly private endeavor. (I say “mostly” because they are still relying on a not yet approved $1.6 billion loan from the Federal Railroad Administration.)

Is this something enough people would use to make it profitable? Having just this week finished a twice delayed, 36 hour airplane adventure trying to get back to New York from Tennessee – in which they managed to lose my luggage until today – I find myself once again sort of yearning for more opportunities for rail as an option. Granted, it doesn’t work all over the country economically, but given how generally horrible air travel has become for the economy class flyer, I bet a lot of people would give it a look in high traffic areas. The Northeast corridor is one obvious choice, but the Florida coast might be another. And they claim they’ll be able to cut the cost of matching plane ticket by as much as $150 per one way trip.

What do you think? Is everything old actually new again, and would you want to see these sorts of conventional rail options? If they can make it profitable, I don’t see why they shouldn’t give it a whirl.


Related Posts:

Source from: hotair

Sunday, February 23, 2014

Railroads, regulators reach a deal on new safety measures

Railroads,regulatorsreachadealonnewsafety

Railroads, regulators reach a deal on new safety measures

posted at 5:31 pm on February 22, 2014 by Erika Johnsen

If it seems like you’ve been noticing an increasing number of news items about railroad derailments and accidents lately, it’s because you have; because of our own shale oil-and-gas boom combined with the development of Canada’s oil sands, minus the requisite shipping infrastructure to transport all of it, rail traffic has exploded as a means of shipping these energy products to the nation’s refineries.

Federal investigators say a freight train that crashed outside Pittsburgh last week and spilled thousands of gallons of crude oil was carrying heavy Canadian crude, marking the first U.S. rail spill of the controversial oil at the center of the Keystone pipeline debate.

A 120-car Norfolk Southern train derailed on a curve in Vandergrift, Pa., at 8 a.m. Feb. 13 and crashed into a building. Twenty-one cars left the track and spilled from 3,500 to 12,000 gallons of the tar-like crude. About 75 percent of the spill has been cleaned up, and none entered the local water supply. No injuries were reported.

The upswing in these costly, disruptive, dirty, and sometimes deadly accidents has everybody worried, and on Friday, federal regulators and the rail industry agreed to new voluntary measures aimed at making it safer to ship crude oil via rail tanker, including increased track inspections and lower speed limits in some urban areas. Via the WSJ:

The agreement comes a little more than a month after federal regulators and the rail and petroleum industries met to discuss enhancing safety measures after several recent accidents involving tank cars containing crude—including a fiery derailment in Quebec last July that killed 47 people.

“Safety is our top priority, and we have a shared responsibility to make sure crude oil is transported safely from origin to destination,” U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said in a statement.

Federal regulators have been investigating a series of accidents involving exploding tank cars filled with crude from the Bakken oil fields. While crude oil is considered hazardous, it isn’t usually explosive. Derailments by trains—typically caused by track or equipment problems—have triggered the accidents.

Safety measures addressed at the meeting also included sharing information on the composition of crude from the Bakken shale, which the government has warned may be more explosive than other types of crude, as well as examining adding new safety features for tank cars that carry crude.

These new safety measures are a good development, but you know what’s an even safer way to transport all that oil? Terrestrial pipelines. Like, you know, the huge one Canada has been pushing to build for five years now, that the State Department has already concluded several times over would be the most efficient and environmental way to get the job done? What’s that one called again?


Related Posts:

Source from: hotair

Saturday, February 22, 2014

Railroads, regulators reach a deal on new safety measures

Railroads,regulatorsreachadealonnewsafety

Railroads, regulators reach a deal on new safety measures

posted at 5:31 pm on February 22, 2014 by Erika Johnsen

If it seems like you’ve been noticing an increasing number of news items about railroad derailments and accidents lately, it’s because you have; because of our own shale oil-and-gas boom combined with the development of Canada’s oil sands, minus the requisite shipping infrastructure to transport all of it, rail traffic has exploded as a means of shipping these energy products to the nation’s refineries.

Federal investigators say a freight train that crashed outside Pittsburgh last week and spilled thousands of gallons of crude oil was carrying heavy Canadian crude, marking the first U.S. rail spill of the controversial oil at the center of the Keystone pipeline debate.

A 120-car Norfolk Southern train derailed on a curve in Vandergrift, Pa., at 8 a.m. Feb. 13 and crashed into a building. Twenty-one cars left the track and spilled from 3,500 to 12,000 gallons of the tar-like crude. About 75 percent of the spill has been cleaned up, and none entered the local water supply. No injuries were reported.

The upswing in these costly, disruptive, dirty, and sometimes deadly accidents has everybody worried, and on Friday, federal regulators and the rail industry agreed to new voluntary measures aimed at making it safer to ship crude oil via rail tanker, including increased track inspections and lower speed limits in some urban areas. Via the WSJ:

The agreement comes a little more than a month after federal regulators and the rail and petroleum industries met to discuss enhancing safety measures after several recent accidents involving tank cars containing crude—including a fiery derailment in Quebec last July that killed 47 people.

“Safety is our top priority, and we have a shared responsibility to make sure crude oil is transported safely from origin to destination,” U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said in a statement.

Federal regulators have been investigating a series of accidents involving exploding tank cars filled with crude from the Bakken oil fields. While crude oil is considered hazardous, it isn’t usually explosive. Derailments by trains—typically caused by track or equipment problems—have triggered the accidents.

Safety measures addressed at the meeting also included sharing information on the composition of crude from the Bakken shale, which the government has warned may be more explosive than other types of crude, as well as examining adding new safety features for tank cars that carry crude.

These new safety measures are a good development, but you know what’s an even safer way to transport all that oil? Terrestrial pipelines. Like, you know, the huge one Canada has been pushing to build for five years now, that the State Department has already concluded several times over would be the most efficient and environmental way to get the job done? What’s that one called again?


Related Posts:

Source from: hotair