Showing posts with label bloggers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bloggers. Show all posts

Friday, June 27, 2014

That’s all, folks!

That’sall,folks! postedat4:41pm

That’s all, folks!

posted at 4:41 pm on June 27, 2014 by Erika Johnsen

Well, this is it, friends — my last post as a full-time blogger for Hot Air, and it is a bittersweet moment if ever there was one.

On the one hand, as regular readers might have noticed in my blogging over the past two-plus years, I’ve developed something of a penchant for energy issues and environmental policy, and that’s an avenue that I’m excited to keep pursuing when I start my legal education at the University of Arizona later this summer. As ever, I believe that free markets/trade, private property, competition, and bottom-up innovation are much more effective agents for solving environmental problems than the big government, public spending, collective ownership, top-down regulatory methods for which self-titled environmentalists are constantly advocating, and the unintended consequences of which they always seem to be neglecting; with that philosophy in mind, I’ll be working to bring the fight to eco-progressives on what is usually their presupposed home turf.

On the other hand, the many opportunities afforded to me via Hot Air are what helped me to thresh that philosophy out in the first place, and I know I am going to feel bereft without the regularly scheduled missives that allow me to opine/engage/rage about the news of the day. (Le sigh.) I still have to pinch myself sometimes when I see my byline next to those of Ed Morrissey, Allahpundit, Jazz Shaw, and Mary Katharine Ham, all of whom work tirelessly to make this site what it is and have inspired me in so many ways. A huge thank-you to that stupendous team, as well as to Jonathan Garthwaite for giving me the chance to be on it and to Guy Benson and Katie Pavlich for being such supportive colleagues and friends. And, of course, a major thank-you to our sincere commenters — you all have helped me to catch my mistakes and reevaluate my own conclusions on about a zillion occasions — and to our loyal readers, without whom this site obviously wouldn’t be a thing.

I’ll try not to be a stranger and to drop in with updates from law school, and in the meantime, keep up the fight, ya’ll!


Related Posts:

Source from: hotair

Saturday, May 17, 2014

Blogger arrested for sneaking into Thad Cochran’s wife’s nursing home room

BloggerarrestedforsneakingintoThadCochran’swife’s

Blogger arrested for sneaking into Thad Cochran’s wife’s nursing home room

posted at 5:31 pm on May 17, 2014 by Jazz Shaw

If the allegations prove true – and the initial evidence seems pretty compelling – this will turn out to be yet another story of a blogger going off the rails and doing the wrong thing in pursuit of a story. According to recently breaking reports, blogger Clayton Thomas Kelly of Mississippi crossed all bounds of propriety by entering the nursing home room of the wife of Senator Thad Cochran (R-Mississippi) and photographing her for use in a political story.

A Pearl man who runs a political blog is accused of sneaking into a nursing home where U.S. Sen. Thad Cochran’s wife is bedridden and photographing her, then posting the image in a video political “hit piece” on the internet.

Madison Police arrested Clayton Thomas Kelly, 28, of Pearl on Friday night on a charge of exploitation of a vulnerable adult. He’s being held on a $100,000 bond.

The police investigating the case put out a press release on the subject today.

The Madison Police Department received information on May 15th, 2014 concerning the possible exploitation of a vulnerable adult resident at Catherine’s Village located at 200 Dominican Drive in the City of Madison. As a result of the investigation, it was determined that Clayton Thomas Kelly – age 28 – of 3127 Greenfield Road Pearl, Ms had illegally and improperly obtained an image of a vulnerable adult resident without their consent for his own benefit. Clayton Kelly’s bond is set at $100,000.00 and he is currently being held at the Madison County Detention Center. The matter remains under investigation by the Madison Police Department.

Kelly’s blog is found here, but the political “hit piece” in question has since been removed.

It is important to note at this point that if there is no evidence suggesting that Kelly is in any way involved with the campaign of Chris McDaniel, currently in a heated primary battle with Senator Cochran, this shouldn’t affect the race. He seems to be an ardent supporter of McDaniel, as indicated by some previous blog posts (here and here) and photos, but that can be said of many people. Elected officials and candidates are, by definition, ultimately responsibile for not only their own actions, but those of their paid and/or appointed staff. But no candidate can control the irrational actions of deranged fans any more than Jodie Foster can be said to be responsible for the attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan.

But is there more to the story? In an update from the Clarion-Ledger, Senator Cochran’s camp is raising an interesting question.

U.S. Sen. Thad Cochran’s campaign is questioning how Chris McDaniel’s campaign manager, state Sen. Melanie Sojourner, apparently knew about Clayton Kelly’s arrest before news of him allegedly sneaking into Rose Cochran’s nursing home room and taking photos broke.

Cochran campaign spokesman Jordan Russell said Sojourner left a voice mail message for Cochran campaign manager Kirk Sims at about 7:45 a.m. on Saturday, offering condolences over Kelly’s alleged actions and assurance McDaniel’s campaign doesn’t condone it. Russell said Sojourner indicated she had been concerned over the incident since Friday night.

Kelly was arrested Friday night. Police issued a press release about Kelly’s arrest late Friday night, but it and early news reports did not mention Rose Cochran, only a brief statement about his charge of exploitation of a vulnerable adult.

A Clarion-Ledger article posted online at 9:24 a.m. broke the news about a connection between the arrest and the Cochrans.

This same article was later updated with a response from the McDaniel campaign:

“The McDaniel campaign found out about the break in when a local political blog posted about it at 11:40 p.m. last night. Senator McDaniel has denounced the break-in and called Senator Cochran to extend his condolences. It is unconscionable for the Cochran campaign and the liberal media to use the act of a sick individual to lob despicable accusations.”

The information still missing at the time of this posting is precisely which “local political blog” posted the information (with the Name of Cochran’s wife, I assume), since the local media didn’t have that detail until the next morning. The missing piece here – and this is purely speculation at this point – could be that the “local blog” in question was, in fact, Kelly’s blog. Since everyone seems to agree that the information had been posted there, and then removed, I suppose that’s possible. Of course, it would require a bit of luck on the part of McDaniel’s campaign manager to have just managed to catch the post on the blog between the time it was published and then pulled, but given the tendency of campaign workers to constantly monitor Google alerts for anything mentioning their opponent’s name, it’s not beyond the realm of the possible. (See Update below.)

If this claim about the phone message and its timing turns out to be true, it adds an entirely new element to the story, but we still need to hear from Sojourner, who isn’t commenting on it yet. If she did, in fact, know about this before the police released any details, including the identity of Cochran’s wife, somebody has some explaining to do and McDaniel will have to be on top of this immediately.

But either way it pans out, Kelly may serve as yet another important example and negative role model for citizen journalists. No matter what your motivation or desire to get into the mix of the political battlefield, there are boundaries which simply can not be crossed. I have no idea what would possess someone to think that invading the privacy of an elderly, bedridden woman suffering from dementia would be useful or a good idea in any way, but it appears that Mr. Kelly is about to learn a very expensive lesson on the subject.

Some similar sentiments from Doug Mataconis:

In the often combative history of American politics, I’ve got to say I don’t recall seeing anything quite like this. And while it was obviously not officially tied to the McDaniel campaign, it certainly seems to be a measure of the extent to which political debate in this country has descended into the gutter. NBC’s Chuck Todd summed it up well on Twitter this morning:

Way over the line, whether the McDaniel campaign was involved or not.

UPDATE: (Jazz) The local blogger reporting on this story is saying that the offending video / pictures were posted either “two weeks ago” or April 26th, depending who you ask, so if that’s the case, the McDaniel camp couldn’t have found it in the way I surmised. Curiouser and curiouser, to quote one fable.


Related Posts:

Source from: hotair

Wednesday, May 7, 2014

Has Putin pulled military back from Ukraine border?

HasPutinpulledmilitarybackfromUkraineborder?

Has Putin pulled military back from Ukraine border?

posted at 12:01 pm on May 7, 2014 by Ed Morrissey

Color me … skeptical. While Vladimir Putin remains under pressure from the West through limited economic sanctions, his ambitions in eastern Ukraine could hardly be going better. He’s on the verge of pushing the former Soviet republic into the kind of collapse that Russia could use as a pretext for occupation. Why would Putin pull back now?

Still, that’s what Putin himself claims:

President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia said Wednesday that Russian troops had pulled back from the Ukraine border, and he urged separatists in eastern Ukraine to postpone a referendum planned for Sunday.

“We were told constantly about concerns over our troops near the Ukrainian border,” Mr. Putin said after meeting with Didier Burkhalter, the president of Switzerland and current head of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. “We have pulled them back. Today they are not at the Ukrainian border but in places of regular exercises, at training grounds.”

Russia positioned 40,000 troops on the Ukrainian border soon after protesters in Kiev pushed President Viktor F. Yanukovych from power on Feb. 28. Mr. Putin’s willingness to send Russian forces under cover into Crimea and his subsequent annexation of the peninsula raised fears that he might do the same in southeastern Ukraine.

Reuters calls this a “potential breakthrough”:

Russian President Vladimir Putin called on pro-Moscow separatists in Ukraine to postpone a vote on secession just five days before it was to be held, potentially pulling Ukraine back from the brink of dismemberment.

It was the first sign the Kremlin leader has given that he would not endorse a referendum planned for Sunday by pro-Russian rebels seeking independence for two provinces with 6.5 million people and around a third of Ukraine’s industrial output.

In what appeared to be a breakthrough in the worst crisis between East and West since the Cold War, Putin also announced he was pulling Russian troops back from the Ukrainian border. Moscow has massed tens of thousands of troops on the frontier, proclaiming the right to invade Ukraine if Russian speakers were threatened.

Putin’s call to postpone the referendum is essentially meaningless. There was no way to conduct a referendum this weekend anyway. In Crimea, the Russians had taken over the civic institutions and imposed their own version of security. That’s not the case in eastern Ukraine; the city of Mariupol has changed hands at least twice in the last 24 hours. The same is true of Putin’s support for the May 25th election, for that matter. Like I wrote earlier, the practical impossibility of holding an election in the middle of a sectarian civil war would sap any credibility from the results. Putin can talk about the election all he wants, but as long as Russian provocateurs continue their work, he knows it will never take place, or at worst never be taken seriously.

That brings us back to the troop withdrawal. That could be significant … if in fact it has happened. Has anyone on the ground verified that the Russian units have returned to their regular positions? So far, all of the news reports on the withdrawal have one source: Vladimir Putin. Even if Putin pulled back, it wouldn’t take much work to redeploy to the border again, and everyone in Ukraine knows it.

Color NATO skeptical, too:

What are Russians saying about this, anyway? Thanks to a new “bloggers law” from Putin, they’re only effectively saying what Putin wants them to say:

Russia has taken another major step toward restricting its once freewheeling Internet, as President Vladimir V. Putin quietly signed a new law requiring popular online voices to register with the government, a measure that lawyers, Internet pioneers and political activists said Tuesday would give the government a much wider ability to track who said what online.

Mr. Putin’s action on Monday, just weeks after he disparaged the Internet as “a special C.I.A. project,” borrowed a page from the restrictive Internet playbooks of many governments around the world that have been steadily smothering online freedoms they once tolerated. …

Widely known as the “bloggers law,” the new Russian measure specifies that any site with more than 3,000 visitors daily will be considered a media outlet akin to a newspaper and be responsible for the accuracy of the information published.

Besides registering, bloggers can no longer remain anonymous online, and organizations that provide platforms for their work such as search engines, social networks and other forums must maintain computer records on Russian soil of everything posted over the previous six months.

“This law will cut the number of critical voices and opposition voices on the Internet,” said Galina Arapova, director of the Mass Media Defense Center and an expert on Russian media law. “The whole package seems quite restrictive and might affect harshly those who disseminate critical information about the state, about authorities, about public figures.”

Putin may not be a credible source — but he wants to make himself the only source in Russia. It looks more and more like Russia is entering a new “pivotal experiment.”


Related Posts:

Source from: hotair

Thursday, October 17, 2013

Former community organizer: Ignore all those bloggers and activists, please

Formercommunityorganizer:Ignoreallthosebloggersand

Former community organizer: Ignore all those bloggers and activists, please

posted at 12:01 pm on October 17, 2013 by Ed Morrissey

Old and busted: Community organizing. New hotness: Listen to your elders! Barack Obama took the opportunity today to lay blame for Washington dysfunction squarely on where it most belongs … outside the Beltway:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUbWzkwGfgA

Sorry, wrong video:

“All of us need to stop focusing on the lobbyists, and the bloggers, and the talking heads on radio, and the professional activists who profit from conflict, and focus on what the majority of Americans sent us here to do,” Obama continued.

Obama went after what he called the “rhetoric” which “gets worse” annually, and for members to focus on where they agree. He cited a “balanced approach” to a budget process as one of these areas of agreement between Democrats and Republicans.

“Had one side not decided to pursue a strategy of brinkmanship, each side could have gotten together and figured out how do we shape a budget that provides certainty to businesses, and people who rely on government?” Obama said.

Hmmm.  Those darned bloggers … say, aren’t these people who actually send people to Congress and the White House?  And didn’t a Senate backbencher embrace them in 2007-8, and then again in 2012 in order to be able to stand at that podium? As for the “professional activists,” does President Establishment recall what he did with his 2012 presidential campaign?  Do the letters “OFA” ring a bell?

Too bad he didn’t take his own advice in 2007. He could have saved us a lot of bother.


Related Posts:

Source from: hotair